Materials: Playing It Safe With Organic Compounds


Development of integrated flexible electronics is important for the construction of advanced wearable devices. And when you consider our fascination with wearables, demand for newer materials to design such wearables also rises. Such developments in the fields of material technology are happening all around us. Ranging from energy generation to lighting, we have some fascinating materials being tested out in labs. 3D printing materials and organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) are also among areas of research.

Carbon based materials, for example, are being used to improve efficiency. Perovskites are one such wide-ranging class of materials consisting of organic molecules. These are made mostly of carbon and hydrogen, bonded with a metal and a halogen, in a three-dimensional crystal lattice. These can be made much more economically compared to conventional materials and with fewer emissions.

Materials: Perovskite fabricated on a glass sheet
Fig. 1: Perovskite fabricated on a glass sheet (Image courtesy:

Solar researches in perovskites

Perovskite based solar cells consist of a transparent conductive oxide-coated glass substrate. With a top encapsulation, these have an evaporated metal cathode providing high-performance solutions.

On the other hand, use of lead makes these not so safe for use. An alternative is to use tin based perovskites, which are non-poisonous. However, current power-conversion efficiency of tin based devices is significantly lower than of lead based devices. Nevertheless, if their development history is any indication, we can look forward to some non-poisonous solar cells with higher efficiency.

A mix of organic and inorganic ions with crystal structures similar to calcium-titanium-oxide (CaTiO3) results in hybrids. Perovskites containing halide ions such as fluoride or chlorine are a sub-set of such hybrids. For converting sunlight to electricity, however, iodide variants are a much better option. Materials such as methylammonium-lead-iodide (CH3NH3PbI3) can convert sunlight to electricity. These have enabled urban poor communities in India to access off-grid electricity. After all, there is only so much coal and hydropower can do.

Oxford Photovoltaics, UK, has begun commercialising thin-film perovskite solar cells. These are directly printed on silicon solar cells, copper-indium-gallium-selenide (CIGS) solar cells or glass. It is one of the three mainstream thin-film technologies—the other two being cadmium-telluride and amorphous-silicon, with a lab-efficiency above 20 per cent.

Making inexpensive solar panels

Solar energy harvesting is an area that shows a lot of promise in renewable energy. The present panels employ silicon solar cells, which are highly efficient, converting up to 21.5 per cent of sunlight that falls on these into electricity, and are very durable.

However, processing silicon wafers is very expensive. Add to that the required thickness of 0.3mm in order to absorb maximum sunlight, the prices just go through the roof.

Thin-film solar cells, often dubbed as the next generation of solar technology, are another option over older silicon models. These are made by layering a thin solar absorbent material over a substrate such as glass or plastic, which can be flexible. The materials being used in the present thin films are, however, a concern. Cadmium in cadmium-telluride (CdTe) is highly toxic, making handling and placement of solar cells a major concern.

The poisonous potential

Solar, an American photovoltaic manufacturer of rigid thin-film modules, has announced an efficiency of 22.1 per cent using experimental cells made from CdTe. It is a thin-film technology, requiring less material to produce a comparable amount of electricity than conventional silicon technology. It is also poisonous to humans. The poisonous material has proven to be highly efficient; in labs, at least. So it would be a boon if we could work around these materials.

Manufacturing process for CdTe solar cells is also simpler, resulting in lower costs for electricity production—purely theoretical, of course. Trade-offs seem to be pretty high there.

Some low-cost solutions

Tara Dhakal, interim director, Centre for Autonomous Solar Power, and assistant professor, department of electrical and computer engineering, Binghamton University, UK, is working with pyrite and copper-zinc-tin-sulfide (CZTS) as these are non-toxic and available in abundance. He has explained the details in a paper earlier this year. The paper reads, “CZTS costs about 0.005 cents per watt, and pyrite costs a mere 0.000002 cents per watt.” The biggest advantage is that, thickness of these chips can go as low as a thousandth of a millimetre.

In a study earlier this year, researchers at Stanford University, USA, and University of California at Berkeley, USA, estimated that, by 2050, 45 per cent of electricity in America could be dependent on solar energy. Fool’s gold seems to be taking over liquid gold, at least in the western hemisphere.

OLED structure
Fig. 2: OLED structure

Organics in lighting

Organics are coming in use in lighting as well. Moving on from regular LEDs, we now have OLEDs with high luminescence. Some of the best displays in 2016 have been various variants of OLEDs. AMOLED and super-AMOLED are premium lighting devices with amazing clarity. The story behind OLED, however, deals with a lot of chemistry.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here